//

Sit Back and Reflect

In yesterday’s Unverified Voracity, Brian mentioned that the mass media will com up with a message that they want to write about, and then write their article about that whether or not the circumstances are true. For example, he said that the media would assume that fans would criticize Rodriguez’s playcalling, and wrote their articles regardless of whether that was true or not.

Another annoying instance of this I’ve run across is the assumption that Michigan fans think the sky is falling down. With an upset against a far inferior team, among the worst that Michigan will play this year, fans clearly think that Michigan will struggle to win a single game this year…

…except that’s not at all what Michigan fans are saying. Those who have a clue (which is, thankfully and surprisingly, a majority) realize that Utah might be the best non-Ohio State team (and certainly among them) that the Wolverines will face in 2008, and have set expectations accordingly. Sure, people are disappointed in the play of the offense, but nearly everyone I’ve talked to has been encouraged by the play of the defense in the second half, and thinks that the offense can only improve with Steven Threet the man in charge. The most negative article I’ve seen was Brian’s game column.

So, mass media, don’t make assumptions about fan perception and write your articles from your assumptions: you might want to take into account, you know, the truth.

Posted under Analysis

Become a Fan of Varsity Blue

Not that you aren’t already, but it’s time to make it official, since we all know that Facebook is more real than real life.

Become a fan of Varsity Blue on Facebook.

Posted under Blog News

Comments Off on Become a Fan of Varsity Blue

Tags: ,

Blogpoll Preliminary Ballot: Week 1

Rank Team Delta
1 Ohio State
2 Florida
3 Southern Cal 1
4 Georgia 1
5 Oklahoma
6 Texas 3
7 LSU 3
8 West Virginia
9 Wisconsin 2
10 Penn State 3
11 Missouri 5
12 Alabama 14
13 Auburn 1
14 South Florida 2
15 Oregon
16 South Carolina 10
17 Tennessee
18 Oklahoma State 3
19 Utah 4
20 Brigham Young 6
21 Wake Forest 5
22 Colorado 4
23 Arizona State 5
24 California 2
25 Illinois 3

Dropped Out: Clemson (#7), Texas Tech (#12), Virginia Tech (#19), Pittsburgh (#20), Nebraska (#24), Michigan (#25).

Games Watched: All Big Ten games except OSU-YSU, Wisconsin-Akron, and Indiana-WKU (Thank you, BTN!). I have OSU on the DVR so I’ll watch that before my final ballot on Wednesday. I also saw Oregon-Washington, some of Clemson-Bama, Wake-Baylor, Stanford-Oregon State, Most of South Carolina-NC State, and snippets of a few other games. I also have a couple more on the DVR at home that I’ll probably spend Labor Day watching.

Notes: I’m not married to this order, so help me out if there’s something I missed or something you disagree with. USC moved up beause of a solid win over a program with a pulse – or at least 1-A standing. The same can be said for the other USC, except their opponent was expected to be much better.

Most teams that moved up did so on the basis of attrition ahead of them more than anything. Missouri moved down because I think Illinois’ offensive success was based more on a crappy Tigers defense than a radically improved Juice Williams. By the same token, Illinois moved down because a strong defense was supposed to carry them to a certain extent this year – eh, not so much.

Penn Sate sold me on the Spread HD so far. I’m willing to give them the benefit of the doubt against a good team before my skepticism holds me back on them. Texas Tech didn’t take too much of a hit despite an uninspiring win against Eastern Washington because I think early-season cobwebs were to blame for most of their 7,387 penalty yards, and they’ll come around quickly.

Posted under BlogPoll

The Utah Game in Allusions

Having taken advantage of one of the more “liberal” offerings of LS&A, political science major with a minor in philosophy to be specific, I constantly try to validate the classes I took by using what I learned in “real life.” So… a college football blog isn’t quite “real life,” but it’s close, so I’m going to break down portions of the Utah game using a wide swath of Western culture (no offense to Eastern culture, but I didn’t get much of it).

  • Nick Sheridan is Hector of Troy: Their histories are a stretch to match, although one was a son of king, the other a son of coach. They were both intelligent, gritty and determined, and somewhat respected. Hector died fighting a battle he had no chance of winning, a one on one duel against Achilles. Sheridan, apparently, had no chance of being an effective quarterback. The Utes did not proceed to drag Nick Sheridan back to their encampment behind their chariot, but they embarrassed him all the same.
  • The Offensivee Line is the (Spartans at Thermopylae)-1: Oh, inverted, uh metaphor. I think the weird part was that the offensive line was as effective standing still trying to draw an offsides call as they were trying to block. While the Spartans valiantly stood at the pass and held off the oncoming horde to give the Greeks enough time to prepare a their Navy for a decisive victory, the Michigan offensive line could not hold off the Utes for [insert QB] to get to the mesh point with [insert RB]2. (Note: just because Michigan State fans have latched on to the movie 300 does not mean Michigan fans have to ignore the city-state)
  • The Second Half Defense is the French Army under Napoleon pre-1812: The Napoleonic army was very modern for it’s time and had very well trained soldiers that used rather advanced tactics. He was rarely defeated in battle and wreaked havoc on his enemies. Scott Shafer is taller and every bit the tactician. The defense in the second half played lights out and looked to really confuse the Utah offense. Many times faking retreat and flanking hard.
  • The First Half Defense is All Other French Armies: The Utes marched right through Michigan’s Arc de Triomphe at will.
  • Stephen Threet is Lennie from Of Mice and Men: I’m not calling Threet mildly mentally disabled. From everything I have heard he is an exceptionally intelligent, nice guy, but bear with me here. Lennie was fairly lovable. George always talked about leaving him on his own, but never could bear to abandon the adorable lurch. Something about Lennie kept George around. Lennie was also fairly effective at his various jobs, but didn’t have the higher level subtleties down. Seems fairly accurate right? Now, there’s an obvious difference in scale, but Lennie accidentally choked a women to death and his best friend ended up killing him, while Threet accidentally overthrew some passes and ended up losing the game (Note: he is not solely responsible for losing the game, but he did not win, so therefore…)

So there you have it. Hopefully this isn’t an example of Michigan arrogance…

If enough people like this, it could become a weekly thing.

Posted under Analysis